Chi usa o produce un pesticida nicotiniode mette a rischio, oltre alle api, anche la nostra sopravvivenza. Datemi una mano, inserite nei commenti di questo post informazioni sui produttori, sugli utilizzatori, sulle conseguenze sull'ambiente. Chi avvelena un'ape, avvelena anche te.

Alessandro, non c'e' bisogno di aspettare 200 anni. Anni fa stavo passeggiando a Roma, dalle parti di Piazza Fiume, dietro il palazzo della Rinascente. Su un vecchio villino dei primi del '900 semicoperta di edera scorsi una targa su cui ho letto qualcosa del genere: 'il 31 Ottobre 1930 in questa casa nacque Michael Collins, membro dell'equipaggio Apollo 11 etc. Non mi riusciva proprio di associare l'immagine dell'equipaggio di una avveniristica missione lunare con una vecchia costruzione in stile in un quartiere tutto sommato antico della mia citta'. Consiglio la visita agli appassionati di queste cose. Alessandro, lo so bene che l'effetto di invitare a ridurre le polemiche e' sempre quello di montare. Una polemica, pero' il mio vorrebbe essere un invito, un semplice invito, a impegnarci in generale a non trasformare il discorso in una sterile polemica ogni volta.

Qui non si tratta di opinioni diverse, si tratta semplicemente di provare a limitare con uno sforzo personale, visto che siamo sempre gli stessi piu' o meno qui, il rumore di fondo. Questo blog ha un ruolo importante per combattere l'immondizia che ci propinano molti media e mi chiedo se questo sia il modo migliore di farne uso. E' un problema vecchio come internet (ricordo che c'e' un rfc sulla netiquette che ne parla) ma magari, visto che tutti o quasi qui ci riconosciamo in una certa visione 'razionale' del mondo, non si potrebbe provare a fare un uso migliore di questo strumento? Non mi riferisco a nulla in particolare, ma al caso generale. Su un altro topic si stanno scannando da decine di giorni su chi ha cominciato a fare per primo il cafone. Vi pare la cosa migliore? Comunque, ripeto, mi piacerebbe sapere cosa ne pensa il nostro ospite.

Io credo che con un po' di sforzo si potrebbe fare di piu'. Per esempio aggiungere informazioni, raccontare cose che non sappiamo. Piuttosto che pensare di poter avere sempre l'ultima parola. E proprio per questo chiudo qui. Voglio vedere se sono l'unico a pensarla cosi, nel qual caso accettero' l'esito della discussione e mi ci adattero'. Tutto sommato non invidio del tutto Buzz, Neil e gli altri astronauti del progetto Apollo. Soprattutto i primi, non tanto gli altri che erano spesso 'scienziati' in prestito, con il loro interesse che valicava l'impresa.

Dev'essere una vita difficilissima quella di chi ha passato un 'picco' nella sua esistenza che SA dall'inizio, da quando era giovane, che non potra' mai superare ne sperare di ripetere. E' una vita percorsa quasi tutta in discesa. Un giocatore di calcio puo' pensare che ripetera' il gol, che passera' ad altre cose. Una cantante puo' continuare ad avere successo fino a 60 anni e oltre. Un astronauta difficilmente riesce a durare piu' di 10-15 anni in servizio. Uno come lui sa che e' fatta per sempre dal giorno dell'ammaraggio e che tutto questo non tornera' mai piu'. A me non sorprende che tanti astronauti abbiano avuto difficolta' enormi a 'reinserirsi' nella vita di tutti i giorni (soprattutto quelli della sedia sinistra), piuttosto che molti di loro abbiano avuto la capacita' di riprendersi.

Quello che volevo dire e' che, come noto, molti dei 12 astronauti del programma Apollo scesi sulla Luna hanno avuto nel seguito qualche difficolta' di reinserimento. E' una questione che e' stata dibattuta a lungo. La loro missione e' stata molto piu' speciale rispetto ad altre missioni Gemini o STS, perche' le missioni Apollo sono state un traguardo di fatto ineguagliato.

Naturalmente c'e' l'eccezione, come e' il caso di Gene Cernan (cui ho avuto il grande onore di stringere la mano anni fa), che essendo pero' uno scienziato prestato all'astronautica aveva gia' degli interessi professionali molto forti di suo. Ho letto parecchio, come immagino molti di voi, sull'argomento. Ma ho una mia piccola teoria in merito. E cioe' che e' anche un effetto legato al fatto che per anni e anni queste persone hanno dedicato tutte le proprie energie a un giorno particolare, quello del loro allunaggio, ma mai al giorno dopo, cioe' quello del loro rientro, in cui questa esperienza avrebbe fatto parte di un passato assolutamente straordinario ma per sempre irrecuperabile. Lessi da qualche parte che il problema principale riguarda coloro che sedevano alla sinistra del pilota (la posizione di Aldrin). Puo' essere solo statistica ma secondo alcuni di loro e' perche' chi non era sottoposto alla tensione di quel momento aveva piu' tempo per pensare.

Lo trovo un concetto difficile da dimostrare, ma comunque molto bello, e se fossi stato li mi sarebbe piaciuto chiedere a Buzz cosa ne pensasse di questa idea. Se io faccio l'astronomo di professione oggi, lo devo soprattutto a Buzz, a Neil Armstrong e a Michael Collins che seminarono in tantissimi ragazzi e bambini della mia generazione un amore profondo per l'astronomia. Grazie Buzz, grazie di tutto. @ psg Mi faresti una lista di tutti questi astronauti che hanno avuto problemi, con relative fobie. Senza polemica eh:-). Sono curioso.a parte Aldrin, di cui avevo sentito di questa storia dell' alcolismo e di Mitchell che ha iniziato a straparlare, non conosco altri casi. Magari non tutti hanno avuto la carriera del mio idolo Young, ma dubito che siano diventati tutti una manica di eccentrici:-).

Anche perche' l' unico scienziato sara' stato il solo Cernan, ma gli altri non erano dei semplici militari, ma piloti collaudatori con uno/ due lauree.

The LilyPond Report #28. November 12, 2012 The focuses on the in Waltrop, Germany last August. Of course, there are also some musings on LilyPond triggered by the release of 2.16.0 and 2.17.0 occuring from that venue. There are also two monthly financial reports from David Kastrup whose work on LilyPond is by financial contributions from other developer and users (thank you!), and a report about experiences from using LilyPond internally.

Come now; comments and contributions are warmly encouraged! Nota: DIR si trova generalmente in /Applications/ • Crea file simili lilypond-book, convert-ly, e un qualsiasi altro script tu voglia usare, sostituendo bin/lilypond con bin/convert-ly (o il nome di un altro programma). • Rendi eseguibile il file, chmod u+x lilypond • Ora, aggiungi questa directory alla tua variabile path. Modifica (o crea) un file chiamato.profile nella tua home in modo che contenga export PATH=$PATH:~/bin Questo file deve finire con una linea bianca.

Lanciare i singoli script Gli script — come lilypond-book, convert-ly, abc2ly, e anche lilypond stesso — sono inclusi nel file.app per MacOS X. Gli script possono essere eseguiti dalla linea di comando anche lanciandoli direttamente.

GNU General Public License Version 3, 29 June 2007 Copyright © 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. Preamble The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works. The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program—to make sure it remains free software for all its users.

We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too. When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things. To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others. For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received.

You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights. Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it. For the developers’ and authors’ protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users’ and authors’ sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.

Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users’ freedom to change the software.

The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.

Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents. States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that patents cannot be used to render the program non-free. The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow. TERMS AND CONDITIONS • Definitions. “This License” refers to version 3 of the GNU General Public License. “Copyright” also means copyright-like laws that apply to other kinds of works, such as semiconductor masks.

“The Program” refers to any copyrightable work licensed under this License. Each licensee is addressed as “you”.

“Licensees” and “recipients” may be individuals or organizations. To “modify” a work means to copy from or adapt all or part of the work in a fashion requiring copyright permission, other than the making of an exact copy. The resulting work is called a “modified version” of the earlier work or a work “based on” the earlier work. A “covered work” means either the unmodified Program or a work based on the Program. To “propagate” a work means to do anything with it that, without permission, would make you directly or secondarily liable for infringement under applicable copyright law, except executing it on a computer or modifying a private copy. Propagation includes copying, distribution (with or without modification), making available to the public, and in some countries other activities as well. To “convey” a work means any kind of propagation that enables other parties to make or receive copies.

Mere interaction with a user through a computer network, with no transfer of a copy, is not conveying. An interactive user interface displays “Appropriate Legal Notices” to the extent that it includes a convenient and prominently visible feature that (1) displays an appropriate copyright notice, and (2) tells the user that there is no warranty for the work (except to the extent that warranties are provided), that licensees may convey the work under this License, and how to view a copy of this License. If the interface presents a list of user commands or options, such as a menu, a prominent item in the list meets this criterion. • Source Code. The “source code” for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. “Object code” means any non-source form of a work. A “Standard Interface” means an interface that either is an official standard defined by a recognized standards body, or, in the case of interfaces specified for a particular programming language, one that is widely used among developers working in that language.

The “System Libraries” of an executable work include anything, other than the work as a whole, that (a) is included in the normal form of packaging a Major Component, but which is not part of that Major Component, and (b) serves only to enable use of the work with that Major Component, or to implement a Standard Interface for which an implementation is available to the public in source code form. A “Major Component”, in this context, means a major essential component (kernel, window system, and so on) of the specific operating system (if any) on which the executable work runs, or a compiler used to produce the work, or an object code interpreter used to run it. The “Corresponding Source” for a work in object code form means all the source code needed to generate, install, and (for an executable work) run the object code and to modify the work, including scripts to control those activities. However, it does not include the work’s System Libraries, or general-purpose tools or generally available free programs which are used unmodified in performing those activities but which are not part of the work. For example, Corresponding Source includes interface definition files associated with source files for the work, and the source code for shared libraries and dynamically linked subprograms that the work is specifically designed to require, such as by intimate data communication or control flow between those subprograms and other parts of the work. The Corresponding Source need not include anything that users can regenerate automatically from other parts of the Corresponding Source.

The Corresponding Source for a work in source code form is that same work. Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge Mp4 Mobile Movie Download here. • Basic Permissions. All rights granted under this License are granted for the term of copyright on the Program, and are irrevocable provided the stated conditions are met.

This License explicitly affirms your unlimited permission to run the unmodified Program. The output from running a covered work is covered by this License only if the output, given its content, constitutes a covered work. This License acknowledges your rights of fair use or other equivalent, as provided by copyright law. You may make, run and propagate covered works that you do not convey, without conditions so long as your license otherwise remains in force.

You may convey covered works to others for the sole purpose of having them make modifications exclusively for you, or provide you with facilities for running those works, provided that you comply with the terms of this License in conveying all material for which you do not control copyright. Those thus making or running the covered works for you must do so exclusively on your behalf, under your direction and control, on terms that prohibit them from making any copies of your copyrighted material outside their relationship with you.

Conveying under any other circumstances is permitted solely under the conditions stated below. Sublicensing is not allowed; section 10 makes it unnecessary. • Protecting Users’ Legal Rights From Anti-Circumvention Law.

No covered work shall be deemed part of an effective technological measure under any applicable law fulfilling obligations under article 11 of the WIPO copyright treaty adopted on 20 December 1996, or similar laws prohibiting or restricting circumvention of such measures. When you convey a covered work, you waive any legal power to forbid circumvention of technological measures to the extent such circumvention is effected by exercising rights under this License with respect to the covered work, and you disclaim any intention to limit operation or modification of the work as a means of enforcing, against the work’s users, your or third parties’ legal rights to forbid circumvention of technological measures. • Conveying Verbatim Copies. You may convey verbatim copies of the Program’s source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice; keep intact all notices stating that this License and any non-permissive terms added in accord with section 7 apply to the code; keep intact all notices of the absence of any warranty; and give all recipients a copy of this License along with the Program. You may charge any price or no price for each copy that you convey, and you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee. • Conveying Modified Source Versions.

You may convey a work based on the Program, or the modifications to produce it from the Program, in the form of source code under the terms of section 4, provided that you also meet all of these conditions: • The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified it, and giving a relevant date. • The work must carry prominent notices stating that it is released under this License and any conditions added under section 7. This requirement modifies the requirement in section 4 to “keep intact all notices”.

• You must license the entire work, as a whole, under this License to anyone who comes into possession of a copy. This License will therefore apply, along with any applicable section 7 additional terms, to the whole of the work, and all its parts, regardless of how they are packaged. This License gives no permission to license the work in any other way, but it does not invalidate such permission if you have separately received it.

• If the work has interactive user interfaces, each must display Appropriate Legal Notices; however, if the Program has interactive interfaces that do not display Appropriate Legal Notices, your work need not make them do so. A compilation of a covered work with other separate and independent works, which are not by their nature extensions of the covered work, and which are not combined with it such as to form a larger program, in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium, is called an “aggregate” if the compilation and its resulting copyright are not used to limit the access or legal rights of the compilation’s users beyond what the individual works permit. Inclusion of a covered work in an aggregate does not cause this License to apply to the other parts of the aggregate. • Conveying Non-Source Forms. You may convey a covered work in object code form under the terms of sections 4 and 5, provided that you also convey the machine-readable Corresponding Source under the terms of this License, in one of these ways: • Convey the object code in, or embodied in, a physical product (including a physical distribution medium), accompanied by the Corresponding Source fixed on a durable physical medium customarily used for software interchange.

• Server Acim. GNU/LilyPond (Turkish Language). • Graham Percival. Sustainability in F/OSS: developers as a non-renewable resource. In Rencontres Mondiales du Logiciel Libre 2010 (RMLL2010), 2010. • Han Wen Nienhuys and Jan Nieuwenhuizen.

LilyPond, a system for automated music engraving. In Colloquium on Musical Informatics (XIV CIM 2003), May 2003.

• Han Wen Nienhuys. LilyPond, Automated music formatting and the Art of Shipping. In Forum Internacional Software Livre 2006 (FISL7.0), 2006. • Margarethe Maierhofer Lischka & Florian Hollerweger.

Lilypond: music notation for everyone! In Linux Audio Conference 2013 (LAC2013), 2013.

• Reinhold Kainhofer. OrchestralLily: A Package for Professional Music Publishing with LilyPond and LATEX.

In The Linux Audio Conference 2010 (LAC2010), 2010. • Erik Sandberg. Separating input language and formatter in GNU LilyPond.

Master’s thesis, Uppsala University, Department of Information Technology, March 2006. The LilyPond Report #28.

November 12, 2012 The focuses on the in Waltrop, Germany last August. Of course, there are also some musings on LilyPond triggered by the release of 2.16.0 and 2.17.0 occuring from that venue. There are also two monthly financial reports from David Kastrup whose work on LilyPond is by financial contributions from other developer and users (thank you!), and a report about experiences from using LilyPond internally.

Come now; comments and contributions are warmly encouraged! LilyPond 2.18.1 February 16, 2014 We have released updated manuals for LilyPond’s stable version, 2.18. The manuals are now for 2.18.1 and have a number of updates and improvements over 2.18.0. There will be a further release of 2.18 in the future (2.18.2), and this will include the updates to the manuals as well as some minor enhancements to the LilyPond core functionality.

To summarise the current situation: stable LilyPond application: 2.18.0; stable LilyPond manuals: 2.18.1; development for both: 2.19.2. LilyPond 2.17.22 released! July 14, 2013 We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.17.22. This release contains the usual number of bugfixes and enhancements, and contains some work in progress. You will have access to the very latest features, but some may be incomplete, and you may encounter bugs and crashes. If you require a stable version of Lilypond, we recommend using the 2.16 version.

This update cures the issue with the Windows version crashing with a problem with positioning text. Release candidate 8 of 2.16 - LilyPond 2.15.41 released! July 4, 2012 LilyPond 2.15.41 is out; this is the eighth release candidate of the upcoming 2.16 stable release. All users are invited to experiment with this version. New features since 2.14.2 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about. There are no known Critical issues with this release.

If no Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.16.0 release will be on 18 July 2012. If you discover any problems, please send us.

Release candidate 7 of 2.16 - LilyPond 2.15.39 released! May 22, 2012 LilyPond 2.15.39 is out; this is the seventh release candidate of the upcoming 2.16 stable release. All users are invited to experiment with this version.

New features since 2.14.2 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about. There are no known Critical issues with this release. If no Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.16.0 release will be on 05 June 2012. If you discover any problems, please send us. Release candidate 5 of 2.16 - LilyPond 2.15.37 released! April 19, 2012 LilyPond 2.15.37 is out; this is the fifth release candidate of the upcoming 2.16 stable release. All users are invited to experiment with this version.

New features since 2.14.2 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about. There are no known Critical issues with this release. If no Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.16.0 release will be on 03 May 2012. If you discover any problems, please send us. Release candidate 4 of 2.16 - LilyPond 2.15.36 released! April 6, 2012 LilyPond 2.15.36 is out; this is the fourth release candidate of the upcoming 2.16 stable release.

All users are invited to experiment with this version. New features since 2.14.2 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about.

There are no known Critical issues with this release. If no Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.16.0 release will be on 20 April 2012.

If you discover any problems, please send us. Release candidate 3 of 2.16 - LilyPond 2.15.30 released!

Feb 17, 2012 LilyPond 2.15.30 is out; this is the third release candidate of the upcoming 2.16 stable release. All users are invited to experiment with this version. New features since 2.14.2 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about.

There are no known Critical issues with this release. If no Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.16.0 release will be on 02 March 2012.

If you discover any problems, please send us. Release candidate 2 of 2.16 - LilyPond 2.15.12 released! Sep 20, 2011 LilyPond 2.15.12 is out; this is the second release candidate of the upcoming 2.16 stable release. All users are invited to experiment with this version.

New features since 2.14.2 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about. There are no known Critical issues with this release. If no Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.16.0 release will be on 27 Sep 2011. If you discover any problems, please send us. Release candidate 1 of 2.16 - LilyPond 2.15.8 released! Aug 01, 2011 LilyPond 2.15.8 is out; this is the first release candidate of the upcoming 2.16 stable release. All users are invited to experiment with this version.

New features since 2.14.2 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about. There are no known Critical issues with this release. If no Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.16.0 release will be on 08 Aug 2011.

If you discover any problems, please send us. Release candidate 7 of 2.14 - LilyPond 2.13.63 released! May 30, 2011 LilyPond 2.13.63 is out; this is the seventh release candidate of the upcoming 2.14 stable release. All users are invited to experiment with this version. New features since 2.12.3 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about.

There are no known Critical issues with this release. If no Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.14.0 release will be on June 6, 2011. If you discover any problems, please send us. Release candidate 6 of 2.14 - LilyPond 2.13.58 released! April 7, 2011 LilyPond 2.13.58 is out; this is the sixth release candidate of the upcoming 2.14 stable release. All users are invited to experiment with this version. New features since 2.12.3 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about.

There are no known Critical issues with this release. If no Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.14.0 release will be on April 14, 2011. If you discover any problems, please send us.

Release candidate 5 of 2.14 - LilyPond 2.13.57 released! April 3, 2011 LilyPond 2.13.57 is out; this is the fifth release candidate of the upcoming 2.14 stable release. All users are invited to experiment with this version. New features since 2.12.3 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about. There are no known Critical issues with this release.

If no Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.14.0 release will be on April 10, 2011. If you discover any problems, please send us. Release candidate 4 of 2.14 - LilyPond 2.13.56 released! Mar 29, 2011 LilyPond 2.13.56 is out; this is the fourth release candidate of the upcoming 2.14 stable release.

All users are invited to experiment with this version. New features since 2.12.3 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about. There are no known Critical issues with this release. If no Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.14.0 release will be on April 5, 2011. If you discover any problems, please send us. Release candidate 3 of 2.14 - LilyPond 2.13.54 released!

Mar 13, 2011 LilyPond 2.13.54 is out; this is the third release candidate of the upcoming 2.14 stable release. All users are invited to experiment with this version.

New features since 2.12.3 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about. There are no known Critical issues with this release. If no Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.14.0 release will be on March 27, 2011. If you discover any problems, please send us. Release candidate 2 of 2.14 - LilyPond 2.13.49 released! Feb 9, 2011 LilyPond 2.13.49 is out; this is the second release candidate of the upcoming 2.14 stable release. All users are invited to experiment with this version.

New features since 2.12.3 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about. There are no known Critical issues with this release. If no Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.14.0 release will be on Feb 23, 2011. If you discover any problems, please send us. Release candidate 1 of 2.14 - LilyPond 2.13.46 released!

Jan 12, 2011 LilyPond 2.13.46 is out; this is the first release candidate of the upcoming 2.14 stable release. All users are invited to experiment with this version. New features since 2.12.3 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about. There are no known Critical issues with this release. If no Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.14.0 release will be on 26 Jan 2011. If you discover any problems, please send us.

Beta test three of 2.14 – LilyPond 2.13.44 released! Dec 25, 2010 LilyPond 2.13.44 is out; this is the third beta test of the upcoming 2.14 stable release. Users are invited to experiment with this version. New features since 2.12.3 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about.

There is still one Critical problem with this release: in one case, the vertical spacing is much too compressed. If you decide to test this version, do not be surprised to discover problems; just send us polite. Beta test two of 2.14 – LilyPond 2.13.43 released! Dec 14, 2010 LilyPond 2.13.43 is out; this is the second beta test of the upcoming 2.14 stable release. Users are invited to experiment with this version.

New features since 2.12.3 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about. There is still one Critical problem with this release: in one case, the vertical spacing is much too compressed. If you decide to test this version, do not be surprised to discover problems; just send us polite. Beta test one of 2.14 – LilyPond 2.13.39 released!

Nov 15, 2010 LilyPond 2.13.39 is out; this is the first beta test of the upcoming 2.14 stable release. Users are invited to experiment with this version. New features since 2.12.3 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about. There are still some Critical problems with this release: the vertical spacing is suspicious in two cases, and lilypond can crash with some odd input. If you decide to test 2.13.39, do not be surprised to discover problems; just send us polite. Alpha test four of 2.14 – LilyPond 2.13.38 released!

Oct 31, 2010 LilyPond 2.13.38 is out; this is the fourth alpha test of the upcoming 2.14 stable release. Users are invited to experiment with this version. New features since 2.12.3 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about. There are still some Critical problems with this release: the vertical spacing is suspicious in two cases, and lilypond can crash with some odd input. If you decide to test 2.13.38, do not be surprised to discover problems; just send us polite.

Alpha test three of 2.14 – LilyPond 2.13.37 released! Oct 25, 2010 LilyPond 2.13.37 is out; this is the third alpha test of the upcoming 2.14 stable release. Users are invited to experiment with this version. New features since 2.12.3 are listed in the “Changes” manual on the website section about. There are still some Critical problems with this release: the vertical spacing is suspicious in two cases, and lilypond can crash with some odd input. If you decide to test 2.13.37, do not be surprised to discover problems; just send us polite. LilyPond 2.13.21 released!

May 12, 2010 We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.13.21. Yawman And Erbe Clipboard more. This release contains the usual number of bugfixes. However, a number of critical issues still remain, so this release is intended for developers only. This release should be of particular interest to package maintainers: we have made a few changes to the configure script and the required libraries.

Barring any urgent bug reports, this is the build system and libraries that will be used for the next stable release. LilyPond 2.11.65 — Release Candidate. December 2, 2008 This release has improvements to MusicXML import, contributed by Reinhold Kainhofer, and adds support for splitting a book in several book parts, contributed by Nicolas Sceaux. Nested contexts of the same type are now allowed with any depth, and overriding nested properties can be done with list syntax, thanks to Neil Puttock. This is hopefully the last Release Candidate before stable release 2.12, so you are welcome to test this release if you can to report new issues.,,. LilyPond 2.11.58 available. September 13, 2008 LilyPond 2.11.58 is a beta release, which means the next stable release is expected in a few weeks.

This release is also special, as it includes code which supports more flexible automatic accidentals rules, written several months ago by Rune Zedeler, deceased since then. All the development team express their condolences to his family and his friends. Besides this, automatic beaming has been improved by Carl Sorensen, support for creating stem flags in a new style has been contributed by Reinhold Kainhofer, and a few bugs have been fixed.,,. LilyPond 2.7.26 is out - December 31, 2005 This release has an improvement in the MusicXML importer (feature sponsored by Mark vd Borre’s Music Academy): now, staves and voices are also setup, so you can readily run LilyPond on the.ly output. The important occasion for this release is our new build environment: we have completely revamped it, which means that binaries for all platforms (including MacOS, Windows, Linux/x86, but probably FreeBSD too) will be more quickly available for download. A happy 2006 from the LilyPond Development Team! LilyPond 2.7.24 is out - December 20, 2005 This release fixes a couple of bugs, but more importantly, slurs now avoid TupletNumbers, and tuplet numbers may enter the staff (feature sponsored by Trent Johnston), tuplet brackets and numbers are implemented as separate grobs, TupletBracket and TupletNumber (rewrite sponsored by Trent Johnston), string arguments for music functions may be specified without # marks.

This allows syntactical constructs (like clef and bar) to be expressed in generic music functions. LilyPond 2.7.23 is out - December 19, 2005 This release has the following new features: • Ties in chords are also formatted using score based formatting. This reduces the number of collisions for ties in chords (feature sponsored by Steve Doonan). • With the tweak music function, layout objects that are directly connected to input may be tuned easily (feature sponsored by Sean Reed and Bertalan Fodor). • Generic music functions may now also be used on articulations and chord elements (feature sponsored by Sean Reed and Bertalan Fodor).

• Better support for MusicXML, more options for spacing Lyrics; it is now possible to separately specify minimum distances for normal and hyphenated syllables (features sponsored by Mark van den Borre and Bertalan Fodor. January 02, 2005 LilyPond 2.5.6 was released. This is a 'technology preview' release, which means that it has all kinds of nifty features, but is not actually usable for producing nicely printed scores. For this reason, an RPM of this release was not produced.

The PS backend is now completely switched over to Pango/FontConfig: for -f ps, LilyPond only accepts UTF8 input, all text fonts are loaded through Pango, the TeX backend now offloads all metric computations to LaTeX, the SVG and GNOME backends are broken, most probably. And check out the changes in the.